Testing the agent with scenarios
Day 17 of 30 ยท Generative AI 2026: Build AI Apps and Agents
One-liner: Validate the agent with real user scenarios.
Time: 20 to 30 min
Deliverable: Scenario Test Report
Learning goal
You will be able to: Test the agent with real scenarios and record results.
Success criteria (observable)
- At least 5 scenarios are written.
- Each scenario has expected outcomes.
- Results are recorded with pass or fail.
Output you will produce
- Deliverable: Scenario Test Report
- Format: Scenario table plus notes
- Where saved: Course folder under
/generative-ai-2026-build-ai-apps-and-agents/
Who
Primary persona: Digital nomad validating agent behavior Secondary persona(s): Users relying on consistent output Stakeholders (optional): Collaborators
What
What it is
A small set of realistic scenarios that test whether the agent behaves as expected. It gives you evidence of what works and what fails.
What it is not
It is not an automated test suite or a replacement for user feedback. It is a practical check for early stage quality.
2-minute theory
- Scenarios mimic how real users will try the product.
- Expected outcomes make results measurable.
- Regular scenario tests reduce regressions.
Key terms
- Scenario: A realistic input and context a user might provide.
- Expected outcome: The result you want the agent to produce.
Where
Applies in
- QA checks
- Feature validation
Does not apply in
- UI color choices
Touchpoints
- Test logs
- Output reviews
- Bug reports
When
Use it when
- You finish a new agent workflow
- Output quality is uncertain
Frequency
Before each release
Late signals
- Repeated user complaints about output
- Unexpected agent behavior
Why it matters
Practical benefits
- Fewer production surprises
- Faster debugging
- Better user trust
Risks of ignoring
- Low quality releases
- Support overload
Expectations
- Improves: reliability and confidence
- Does not guarantee: perfect accuracy
How
Step-by-step method
- Write 5 realistic scenarios.
- Define expected outcomes.
- Run each scenario.
- Record pass or fail with notes.
Do and don't
Do
- Use real inputs from your niche
- Record failures clearly
Don't
- Only test ideal cases
- Skip documenting results
Common mistakes and fixes
- Mistake: Ideal inputs only. Fix: Add messy inputs.
- Mistake: No expected outcome. Fix: Define one per scenario.
Done when
- Five scenarios are documented.
- Expected outcomes are written.
- Results are recorded.
Guided exercise (10 to 15 min)
Inputs
- Your prompt spec
- Sample user inputs
Steps
- Write 5 scenarios.
- Define expected outcomes.
- Run and record results.
Output format
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Scenario | |
| Expected outcome | |
| Result | |
| Notes |
Pro tip: Keep one scenario that is intentionally messy.
Independent exercise (5 to 10 min)
Task
Add one new scenario based on recent feedback.
Output
Updated test report.
Self-check (yes/no)
- Are scenarios realistic?
- Are outcomes clear?
- Are results recorded?
- Is there at least one messy input?
Baseline metric (recommended)
- Score: 4 of 5 scenarios pass
- Date: 2026-02-06
- Tool used: Notes app
Bibliography (sources used)
Software Testing Basics. ISTQB. 2024-01-01. Read: https://www.istqb.org/
Agent Evaluation Guide. OpenAI. 2026-02-06. Read: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/evals
Read more (optional)
- Test Case Design Why: Simple structures for manual testing. Read: https://www.guru99.com/test-case.html