Slides/briefs: from outline to draft
Why it matters: Slides and briefs require strong structure and crisp wording.
Goals
- Create a slide storyboard.
- Draft speaker notes or brief text.
- Run a clarity check.
Key definitions
- Storyboard: Slide-by-slide plan with key message per slide.
- Key message: The single point the slide must communicate.
- Supporting points: Bullets/data that support the key message.
Workflow (step-by-step)
- Define audience and decision context.
- Create a 8–12 slide storyboard with key message per slide.
- Draft bullets and one proof point per slide.
- Draft speaker notes (optional) and tighten wording.
- QA for clarity: each slide has one message.
Example (good vs bad)
✅ Good: A storyboard where each slide has one message and proof points.
❌ Bad: Slides with many ideas and no structure.
Checklist
- One message per slide.
- Proof points included.
- Wording tightened.
- Decision context clear.
Metrics / criteria
- Time to present reduced; clarity improved.
- Measurable: You can say whether the output is correct/complete (pass/fail or a score).
- Effort: You can produce the result in 15–30 minutes using the workflow.
- Clarity: Another person can run your prompt and get a similar outcome.
Common mistakes + fixes
- Pitfall: Slides that are documents. Fix: Put detail in notes; keep slides crisp.
- Pitfall: Vague instructions. Fix: Add constraints, examples, and a success checklist.
- Pitfall: One-shot prompting. Fix: Iterate: draft → critique → revise → verify.
- Pitfall: No validation. Fix: Add QA steps, tests, and explicit “what counts as done”.
Student tasks
- Apply the workflow to one real work task related to slides/briefs: from outline to draft.
- Create a small artifact: prompt, checklist, rubric, table, draft, or decision note.
- Run one quality check and record what changed after the check.
- Write a 3-sentence reflection: what worked, what failed, and what you will reuse.
Useful external sources
- OpenAI prompt engineering guide: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/prompt-engineering — Prompt structure, iteration, constraints, and evaluation habits.
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework: https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework — Risk framing, governance language, and verification mindset.
- OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications: https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/ — Practical AI safety risks such as prompt injection, leakage, and insecure output handling.
- Google People + AI Guidebook: https://pair.withgoogle.com/guidebook/ — Human-centered AI design, user control, feedback, and failure modes.
Bibliography
- OpenAI prompt engineering guide. https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/prompt-engineering
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework. https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
- OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications. https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/
- Google People + AI Guidebook. https://pair.withgoogle.com/guidebook/